Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8209 13
Original file (NR8209 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

BC
Docket No: 08209-13
9 January 201

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 8 January 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies.

A

kh

careful and conscien

ter tious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the eviaence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or

injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 26 June 2009. You completed your
obligated service honorably; however, as you were never promoted
above pay grade of E-3, and were released from active duty in
that pay grade on 25 June 2013. You were assigned a reentry
code of RE-3R, as required by governing directives.

The Board found that RE-3R is the most favorable reentry code
authorized when a Sailor is discharged at the expiration of his
term of active obligated service and has failed to meet
professional growth criteria as in your case. The alternative
code is RE-4. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or ip justice,

Sincerely,
TRS

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR793 13

    Original file (NR793 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01181-10

    Original file (01181-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 June 1993, you were honorably discharged from active duty while serving in pay grade E-3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06569-10

    Original file (06569-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 18 April 2004, you were honorably discharged from active duty while serving in pay grade E-3, and assigned a reentry code of RE-3R.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0193 14

    Original file (NR0193 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material subniitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board found that RE- 3R is the most favorable reentry ‘code authorized when a Sailor is discharged at the expiration of his term of active...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03837-10

    Original file (03837-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ~ application on 26 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is authorized when an individual is discharged at the expiration of his term of active obligated service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06050-10

    Original file (06050-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07934-01

    Original file (07934-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 28 November 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on proceedi ngs of this Board. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who fail to meet the professional growth criteria for reenlistment or who are not recommended for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05073-00

    Original file (05073-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session,. You were honorably discharged on 23 April Regulations provide that upon separation from active duty, individuals serving in pay grade E-3 professional growth criteria for reenlistment, but who are ,dho have failed to meet eligible in all other respects and recommended for advancement, This means the shall be assigned an RE-3R reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01799-11

    Original file (01799-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 November 2011. At the completion of your required active duty, you were released to the Navy Reserve with an honorable characterization of service, not recommended for retention, and were assigned an RE-3R (failure to meet professional growth criteria) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 07915-04

    Original file (07915-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 22 July 1998 and then served without incident for almost six years. ...